- Acknowledgements
- Summary
- Introduction
- Background
- Data, Analysis Methods, and Performance Measures
- Major Findings and Conclusions
- Recommendations
- List of Figures
- Figure 1. Preferred Archived Data Formats for Mobility Monitoring Program
- Figure 2. Overview of Data Processing within Mobility Monitoring Program
- Figure 3. Estimating Directional Route Travel Times and VMT from Spot Speeds and Volumes
- Figure 4. Illustration of Misleading Trends When Measurement Coverage Increases
- Figure 5. Exploring the Relationship between Congestion Level and Travel Reliability
- List of Tables
- Table 1. Key Features of National Performance Monitoring Programs
- Table 2. Participating Cities and Agencies for 2003 Archived Data
- Table 3. Summary of Data Collection Technologies and Level of Detail in 2003
- Table 4. Summary of 2003 Freeway Archived Data Coverage
- Table 5. 2003 Data Validity Checks in the Mobility Monitoring Program
- Table 6. Summary of 2003 Freeway Archived Data Validity
- Table 7. Summary of 2003 Freeway Archived Data Completeness
- Table 8. National Congestion and Reliability Trends
- Table 9. Trends (2001-2003) in Congestion and Reliability at the Freeway Section Level
- Table 10. Traffic Congestion, Delay, and Reliability Statistics from Mobility Monitoring Program: 2000 through 2003
- Table 11. Different Performance Measures May Reveal Changes in Different Elements of Performance